HOME, ToC    
HOME, ToC   A1, A2, A3, B, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, D, E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, F, G1, G2, G3, H, I, J, K-pdf, L-pdf   

Extract from Introduction (A1, p. 2) last sentance: 

The general public and the international community can require from science that it is able to understand and explain the two most serious climatic changes that occurred 70 respectively 90 years ago, and to what extent they have had an anthropogenic component due to naval warfare during WWI and WWII. A positive answer would underline the book’s subtitle: “Oceans make Climate”, or that:

Climate is the continuation of ocean by other means.

 


Foreword:

By Dieter E. Koop, Oceanographer.

To minimise the danger of anthropogenic global warming (AGW) by carbon dioxide emissions, international institutions require an investment of about 10 times the material cost of the entire World War II within the next few decades. The book deals with the “climate change” issue as well but from a completely different perspective, namely the threat of climatic change by human activities in the marine environment since sailing the seas with screw driven vessels during the last 150 years. The book proves that four months of activities at sea in autumn 1939 had been sufficient to generate the coldest winter in Europe since the Little Ice Age and that six years of global naval war were enough to contribute to the only global cooling period since the world got warmer since about 1850, which lasted from 1940 to the 1970th.

As oceanographer with a professional focus on North Sea and Baltic research, I felt competent enough to do the proof reading for this book. It was pure amazement to me. The ruthless Nazi regime dragged Europe into WWII, and a few months later Europe faced the coldest winter since about 1820. 70 years have passed and science has no idea of what had caused the extreme winter 1939/40. Even worse, there is no sign of interest in the matter although two further extreme winters, and a global cooling period of three decades followed. Even during peace time the huge shipping and fishing industry has the potential to influence the seasons and to contribute to global warming, which climatology has, to my knowledge, never investigated. Meteorology and oceanography should be dismayed that they failed to understand the climatic changes during two world wars, and for not having coordinated their research better to avoid such horrible gaps in understanding the climatic change issue from an oceanographic perspective. This fascinating book is a huge contribution to improve the knowledge of the influence of human activity on climate.

Dr. Arnd Bernaerts deserves thanks. His research is of the finest, curious, innovative, thoughtful, competent, comprehensive, and dedicated. Maybe it needed an all-round man like him, a trainee on one of the last cargo tall sailing ships, ship master of a general cargo vessel, navigator in yacht cup competition, (where I first met him), and as a lawyer, advocate and consultant. His research ability stems from his doctorate in law, his book on the “UN Convention on the Law of the Sea”, and a number of essays. His motive is expressed on page 14 with reference to the “General Obligation” of article 192 in the Law of the Sea Convention: "States have the obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment", noting that::

“This obligation has great importance for the atmosphere, weather and climate, because if mankind understands and protects the oceans, it would minimize the threat to humanity posed by anthropogenic climate change. If man fails on ocean matters, or understands too little, or too late, errors can never be corrected.”

Mankind should realize this and preserve life and nature. Maybe this book can open some ones eyes in this sense. Thanks to the author for pursuing this difficult subject by remarkable independence and looking across scientific disciplines. The book focuses on how man can influence the instable balance in the ocean and atmosphere by blind and unrestrained war or ocean uses. The book serves as a reminder that without the oceans in focus, climate research is likely to fail or head into disaster.

Dieter E. Koop , January 6th 2012
 

HOME, ToC   A1, A2, A3, B, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, D, 

E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, F, G1, G2, G3, H, I, J, K-pdf, L-pdf   

 

“It might appear, therefore, as if the oceanic

circulation and the distribution of temperature

and salinity in the ocean are caused by the

atmospheric processes, but such a conclusion would be

erroneous, because the energy that maintains the

atmospheric circulation is to be greatly supplied

by the oceans.”

Harald Ulrik Sverdrup (1888 – 1957)

"Oceanography for Meteorologists", New York 1942, page 223

 


Extract from : Result (p. 201) last sentence: 

One may have to speak about a lack of professionalism, if it is recalled what an oceanographer H.U. Sverdrup (1942) had already told meteorologists 70 years ago[1]:

 It might appear, therefore, as if the oceanic
circulation and the distribution of temperature
and salinity in the ocean are caused by the
atmospheric processes, but such a conclusion would be
erroneous, because the energy that maintains the 
atmospheric circulation is to be greatly supplied
by the oceans. 


[1] "Oceanography for Meteorologists", New York 1942, page 223.

 

  Top of Page
Sitemap      Contact Us       Disclaimer       Impressum



Traumhaft schöne Immobilien mieten